Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Kibbitzer's column >>

KIBBITZER

Articles Posted: 0  Links Seeded: 117
Member Since: 11/2008  Last Seen: 3/08/2010

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Cash-strapped parents pull kids from day care

Seeded on Sun Nov 9, 2008 1:40 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: msnbc.com
business, msnbci, personal-finance, economy, associated-press, labor, product, financial-impact
Seeded by Kibbitzer
advertisement

The nation's economic troubles play out one family at a time at the New Horizons Learning Center in this struggling city two hours northwest of Chicago.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Kibbitzer's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (168)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
Kibbitzer

This is a tuff one.  Lets bring on the change.

  • 2 votes
#1 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 1:43 PM EST
PassthePork

And let's be quick about it!  This trend will not turn positive very soon.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 2:22 PM EST
techie22

A woman in our church who had worked at a childcare chain

and then opened her own facility had to close last week.  It's

sad becaue she supported Bush in '04 and therefore voted

against her own best interest.  Kerry would have ended the

war and begun a better range of policies to help the economy.

  • 3 votes
#1.2 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 6:57 PM EST
OBAMA (NOT MY PRESIDENT)

BRING ON THE CHANGE? The change will raise taxes on income so EVERYONE can support those who have every excuse in the book to get every dollar they can for free. Stay at home with your kids and raise them, live within your means and stop asking for handouts. This whole mess was not created by any president but the american people themselves. I give money to friends and families who really need it and do not want someone else deciding how much and who gets my money. And the true bottom line is if you are so against the war, get the heck out of the US and find a new place for your citizenship. Now that you've made your wish for change.....youre probably going to get a whole lot more than you bargained for.

    #1.3 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:52 AM EST
    Involved Dad

    I am alarmed at the trend of people crying "victim" and looking for one administration or party to blame and another to save them.

    In 1994 with two young children and Clinton (whom I voted for) in the White House my business hit a bump in the road and I was forced to make some tough decisions. One decision I made was to shift my schedule and remove my kids from Day Care and care for them myself with the help of my wife who teaches school.

    It was tough. I was used to someone else (daycare) doing the daytime raising of my kids and not used to my schedule as well as my freedom being uninterupted by a million questions, dirty diapers and in general someone else's dependance on me.

    After the shock wore off and I "Daddied" up I made it not only work but realized what a fool I'd been to ever cry about my responsibilities to my children. I was overwhelmed with responsibility in my job and from the outside looking in it was impossible to take care of two children and my other responsibilites but somehow I did.....just like my parents did and countless others have for all of history.

    We gripe about working and taking care of our kids while our Great-Grandparents did all of the above without fast-food, grocery stores on every corner, electricity and TV to entertain the kids and ourselves as well as all the other things that technology has brought on us to make our lives so much easier. Heck let's see our soft generation go out and carry water, chop wood, cook every meal from scratch, make and mend clothes all with babies on our hips and no pharmacies on the corner to fix the sniffles and no guarantee of tomorrow. Our generation should be ashamed.

    Now to the results so far of my tough decison: Two well adjusted honor students with great social skills as a result of being drug along with Daddy into meetings, bankers offices, and in general having to act socially responsible from the time they hit the ground. Also a great result is an incredible bond between my kids and my wife and I as a result of the time spent together. They are a blessing I would never have realized had I just got another part-time job or had Clinton came and bailed me out financially and I was "rewarded" by them getting to stay in DayCare.

    • 6 votes
    #1.4 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:35 AM EST
    Whidbey Islander

    Kudos to you involved dad for discovering the value of family. 

    The news article gave me great comfort - America has almost completely lost all semblence of family values - maybe they will rediscover it.

    If it takes a poor economy for Americans to notice their children - that's fabulous! 

    Maybe as a result, we will have better schools and less malls - less children hurting others and more meanigful relationships.  

    Maybe we can all stop feeling that empty feeling after shopping and start feeling some self-esteem as adults that we did right by raising our children instead of choosing others to do so.  

    Maybe too, only parents who really want the responsibility of raising children will have them - and the others who want more stuff instead to fill the voids in their hearts will have a change of heart and opt against having children.

    Deciding to be a parent is the greatest responsiblity one could ever undertake.  Creating memories in their minds of us as parents is the only way we live on - leave a legacy - in this life after we die - the new 1000" TV won't. 

    As a result of the economy, may many parents choose the decision you did Involved Dad.  The world is already at least 4 people happier as a result of your decision - and I love a happy world!  Thanks!

    • 1 vote
    #1.5 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:24 AM EST
    SonOfLliberty2008

    I think this is a good thing.  My wife and I worked different shifts so that we didn't have strangers raising our children (and to save money). 

    I think daycare is a bad idea.  Parents should raise their own children.

    • 2 votes
    #1.6 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:16 AM EST
    VA Mother of 2

    Stay at home parents are only as good as the parents. Kudos to Involved Dad however I know of the exact opposite of this person in my brother in law. He has stayed home with his children for the last (at least) 3 years and has only made sure that the children are fed - maybe. He turns the TV on from the minute the kids are awake and pays no more attention to them unless they are in his face demanding it. They don't play outside or with peers. He is bipolar and has trouble keeping a job - in fact changes jobs about every 6 months, which used to work for him but in this economy I doubt it for long. My sister can't stand it, but doesn't have any choice because she can't afford real daycare. The downside is now that the kids started Kindergarten (which is only 1/2 day in her state) the kids are behind. They weren't taught the things my kids were from their preschool/daycare. I was lucky enough to stay home with both of my kids for 2-2.5 years after their births. But after 2, kids really need to be in a group setting where they have a chance to learn to play with other children and get their energy out. Both of my 2 yr olds had high energy levels that were well suited for a daycare setting. They enjoyed/enjoy the continuous schedule of jumping from project to project. They are constantly kept busy and learning all day. Of course, I could to some extent teach my children the same things but I don't think I would allow them to be as creatively messy as they are at school. My son actually refers to his daycare as going to work, since that is where mommy goes after she drops him off. He loves it there with all of his friends. It also allows me to value the time I do have with him. We talk about their day, their favorite part and read together at night before bed. It isn't always quantity but quality. Daycare is not evil or the downside to our society, Lazy, uninvolved parents are.

    • 1 vote
    #1.7 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:01 PM EST
    Stressed-719551

    That is great for people who are married to say that putting kids in daycare is a  "bad idea". 

    I am a single parent who have to work a full-time job not by choice but of necessity to live.  I wish i had the option to work at a different time of day or to rely on relative to watch my kids.

    People shouldn't put anyone who puts there kids in daycare.  I wish i could stay at home but i can't.  I think that rates of daycare should go down to make it affordable.

    • 1 vote
    #1.8 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:07 PM EST
    SonOfLliberty2008

    Of course, I could to some extent teach my children the same things but I don't think I would allow them to be as creatively messy as they are at school.

    What a cheezy excuse to avoid raising your own children. 

      #1.9 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:09 PM EST
      brittany-633223

      While I agree that parents should raise their children, not daycare, I am a single mother and I have no choice but to put my daughter in daycare.  I HAVE to work, I am the only source of income.  However, daycare has been the best thing for my daughter, with the activities and making friends, and being in a routine, learning how to interact with others and playing, etc.  But, when we get home I do spend as much time with her as I can, because I miss her and I want her to know that I do love her and want to spend time with her.  I barely go out as it is, and forget trying to date.  I know some single moms who constantly dump off their kids so they can go out with the next fling or happy hour or whatever, and I refuse to do that.  She is not an inconvenience, she is my life.

      • 1 vote
      #1.10 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:15 PM EST
      heatherayers

      I quit my job two years ago to stay at home with my 3 children, the reason?  I couldn't afford daycare. I was making the same amount as the daycare expenses were.  Plus, every time I went to pick up my infant daughter, her legs were blue from sleeping in a baby swing all day. Even though I had asked the child care provider not to even put her in one, she was at the crawling stage and I didn't want her to not be able to crawl. So, I quit my job and went back to school, hoping by the time my 2 year old daughter is in school I will graduate and can find a higher paying job. Then I realized, I should have done this all along.  Our children need us, at least one parent, at home.  I noticed a huge behavioral improvement in my oldest son, just months after I quit.  He had been in daycare from the age of 3 and is now 9. My youngest son, who was in daycare since age 3 months, also made a huge improvement.  I am so glad I quit paying someone else to half-ass raise my children! Our children truly cannot get the emotional and physical support they need to develop by living in a daycare all day.  I know that some people do not have a choice, and I feel for them! They really work to make their children's lives better. But, we have to think about our children and their futures, who cares if we can't buy that $500 cell phone or if we have all the cable channels?  Does that crap even matter anyway? I know times are tough and mortgages and other bills needs to be paid, but it honestly was cheaper for us to cut out the child care.  If both parents have great paying jobs, it may not be the case. By the way, I have yet to walk into a daycare where they are playing with the babies.  The most important developmental stage in their lives and they are left in a chair, in a bed, without any human contact except for diaper changing and feeding.  I worked at a daycare in high school and was told not to hold the babies as they would want that all the time. My sister, who currently works in a daycare, says they have the same rule, which she breaks constantly.  Do you want your baby in that environment??  Like I said, some people don't have a choice, but most people do.  I despise the mother that drops off her kid to go shopping, etc. Maybe that is why all of our kids have ADHD and all of these other disorders.  Maybe all they needed was their parents to care for them. I am just glad it happened to me before it was too late.  I could have worked and worked to have extra money, or even, enough money to pay my bills, these days. I would rather raise my children, make sure they get what they need. I know where they are and what they are doing. I know they are being properly cared for and not being ignored from the 10 other children in the room.  Yes, our budget is tight. Yes, it is stressful. At least I am raising my own kids, not some stranger.

      • 2 votes
      #1.11 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:30 PM EST
      Involved Dad

      Thanks to all for the great responses! Quick follow up:

      About 2 years after I started keeping my kids my business got back on it's feet and I could afford daycare......but at this point it wasn't even an option. I continued to let my kids bless me and improve me as a person rather than send them back to daycare. As to the people who say kids must learn social-interaction and daycare is a great place to do it.....I'll try to be polite but here's my experience and opinion:

      First off I don't take my cues as to how to socially interact in life from toddlers, so why would I presume my kids would be better off learning how to act from them? As proof of this is my children's ability to socially interact SUCCESSFULLY with people of all ages. They learned this (as well as some of Dad's bad habits) from being with me in a real-world environment and watching me tackle day-to-day challenges such as bullies (yes they are out there even in adult life), stress, deadlines and often times my failures and how I responded to those failures. My children listened and watched and believe it or not gleaned mostly the good from this. (Kids are a lot sharper than we give them credit for).

      Also (and to close this point out), kids have from kindergarten to High-School graduation to learn to deal with their peers and if this isn't enough time (12-13 years) to learn how to socially interact with those close to their own age then there is probably some other issues. My kids (by luck or divine intervention who knows?) came into kindergarten able to respectfully interact with both their peers AND more importantly, their teachers. Did I do it all perfect? Heck NO!! But I did have more love for them as individuals than a daycare worker would have and more invested in their outcome and that made (in my opinion) all the difference.

      Was I blessed to have this opportunity? UNBELIEVABLY!!!! Do I think everyone has it? No. But more people have it than they want to admit. I emphasize that initially I DID NOT want to do this. Even though it was my idea I dreaded it at first. But fortunately I followed through with my gut instinct and I am so thankful I did. The school has them everyday now (they are both in High School) and I miss that stressful time of 1000 question an hour on how butterflies fly and how cars go as well as those stressful times when I wondered if they were gonna behave while Daddy was in "Daddy-meetings" with business associates, customers, etc and they were in the floor beside me coloring or pushing toy cars, etc.

      I guess today in this stressful time this article gave me a chance to look at what good things can come from a financially stressful time, and how sometimes the greatest things to happen to us are the things that either seem impossible or a pain in the neck.......

      This my Thank You! to my kids for what they did for me when they didn't even know it and my hope that any parent who has the opportunity to be blessed as I was won't overlook the blessings just waiting to be poured on you.........one dirty diaper or silly question at a time........................

      • 1 vote
      #1.12 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:19 PM EST
      Kikster

      One week of day care for my 1 year old costs $170 a week. I had to scale down to only 3 days a week which costs me $102. My husband's grandparents are helping us out by watching my son the other 2 days.

        #1.13 - Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:08 AM EDT
        Reply
        Joe4422

        We have two young children in day care full-time, and we pay more on a monthly basis than most people do for their mortgage.  These centers charge extremely high rates, as they know parents do not have a choice but to enroll in most cases.  Odds are, if you're looking into enrolling your child in one of these centers, you don't have any other options (parents, grandparents, etc.). 

        Unless you are an educated, white collar worker making close to six figures, you might as well stay at home and raise your child yourself while living on government assistance.

          Reply#2 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 2:32 PM EST
          jlewis21

          Daycare operators are NOT rolling in the dough. They probably make less than you! I mean the managment.

            #2.1 - Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:12 PM EDT
            Reply
            Shaun-394195

            I see a lot more of my single co-workers moving back home to save money, also. Tough times mean tough choices.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#3 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 4:16 PM EST
            solarwindmillyDeleted
            roehoeDeleted
            Josh-304951

            Shaun39- Move back home? Are you serious? How old are you? Why don't you and the rest of the cry babies grow a pair and make it happen on your own? What's this BS about "moving home" all the time? I graduated high school, joined the USMC, saved my money, went to college and made my life for myself. It wasn't always easy, but that is life. To suggest that you have some eternal "ace in the hole" with moving in with mommy and daddy is just juvenile crap! Good God.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#6 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 7:39 PM EST
            Andrea M.

            Everyone's circumstances are different, and there is no one-size-fits-all method for overcoming the obstacles of life. I'm sure you faced your own challenges growing up, and there are many, many people who also face extremely difficult challenges different from your own. You cannot speak for everyone. The "I did it and so you should be able to as well" attitude is extremely shortsighted.

            • 2 votes
            #6.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:50 AM EST
            piglizard420

            And fits well with the right-wing conservative movement to have it all.

              #6.2 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:35 AM EST
              luvenia48

               There will be more and more famlies moving back in together. This is not a bad or a NEW thing. Famlies have been helping each other since the begining of time. I feel sorry for people like you that must think ,when you grow up that you will not need or give help. To make this country whole again it will take us all helping each other. 

                #6.3 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:37 PM EST
                Shaun-394195

                I wasn't speaking about myself, Josh. I was talking about two of my coworkers. I am a single mom, divorced from a wonderful Marine who served in Iraq. Both my boys are in private school, I live on my own, and am paying for my MPA at Cal Stat Long Beach. After being a stay at home mom and then getting out on my own, I know how hard it is and am not knocking anyone for moving back home and neither should you. I left home at 19 and only go back to visit and for the holidays, but who are we to judge what someone else does.

                -Just some black chick from Orange County, CA- 

                • 1 vote
                #6.4 - Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:19 PM EST
                Reply
                George-472467

                Parents can take more loving care of their kids than the majority of daycares in this country.  There are lots of stay at home moms who do fine.  They save money on cars, gas, clothes, cell phones, extra tv's......what did parents do a generation ago do without day care.  They stayed home with kids and got their pleasure from that instead of buying stuff, and more stuff, and more stuff....

                • 5 votes
                Reply#7 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 7:56 PM EST
                BelleforObama

                That would be great in a perfect world. But you are not taking into account all the single parents and people who are working minimum wage because that's all there is. This isn't about buying stuff, I would love to get stuff but can't because we wouldn't have a home, or food, or adequate clothing. I'm scrimping just to purchase winter coats and boots for my three kids. A few years ago this wasn't such a problem. Now just putting gas in the car to get to work and school is too much. We get a $550 paycheck every two weeks, $1100 a month and $695 goes to rent/utilities. I'm losing foodstamps next month because I recieve child support occasionally, but my boyfriend pays childsupport too so it cancels out. You tell me how to stretch this budget? don't forget car insurance, necessities, and gas money. We live in Upper Michigan on the Wisconsin Border, there are no better jobs here. The ones we had are laying off people. I don't think you people understand just how bad it really is out here.

                • 3 votes
                #7.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:17 AM EST
                daisy-369050

                And there are a lot of children getting the BEST care of the day in daycare....ever think of that?

                  #7.2 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:47 AM EST
                  Reply
                  Shaka Zulu

                  My advise to the parents, STOP repeat after me, STOP buying junk, and who said that once you have a kid you need to buy a van or a stupid surbarbun, just live within your means, dont over shop, i see parents buying this and that for their kids, kids dont need toys, they care less about the stupid toys, all they need is the care and loving. Leave within your means, save and save, cut the weekend trips to the mall, get the kids to read more and STOP shopping crap, this is where you spend most of the money. For those that are a couple, pay off the debts as soon as you can, let one parent stay home fulltime with the kids, and let the other work, at least thats what i am doing. For those that are single parents this is where you need your family, but the way i see things, the american family has been broken down due to a number of reasons, however grandparents in this case can be really helpfull. And please NEVER leave kids alone at home or in the car. Just hang in there, hopefully things will get better. Dont lose hope, HOPE sometimes is all you need.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#8 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 8:12 PM EST
                  JohnCarter-428979

                  This is what happens when lack of moral values causes a breakdown of the family. In prior generations, no self-respecting mother would give her children into the care of strangers. It would be a community scandal to be an unmarried mother . A mother stayed home and cared for her own children while her husband went out and earned a paycheck. If for some reason a woman were to lose her husband, all of her friends and relatives would pitch in to find her another mate to provide for her.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#9 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 8:51 PM EST
                  Shaka Zulu

                  You put it very well JohnCarter, well these days its all about alpha male and alpha female sort of crap i guess, we will as society PAY a very HIGH price for this in the near future if not now. We have put everything but family first and let me hope that we change the course of things. Like you stated JC, our grandparents were true heros and geniuses.

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.1 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 9:12 PM EST
                  TheFiftyStateBanana

                  I'm suprised by all of the woman-hating going on here. Horatio Alger was a product of the early 20th century, kid. Pulling yourself up by your boot straps? Wow. Never thought of that one. If this society was as meritocratic as you thought they were, there would be nothing to talk about it. Greed. Corruption. Stupidity. That's the Bush legacy. If he'd managed to de-regulate social security, it wouldn't just be working families on the skids, it'd be all those helpful elder relatives of yours, too. Oh shucks, I just remembered I know tons of people who don't have granma or an auntie or any close family on whom to dump their children.

                  Why are people walking into the abyss? Why, just strolling down Olde Golden Times Lane.

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.2 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:30 AM EST
                  Florida_kes

                  I'm suprised by all of the woman-hating going on here

                  What woman hating? Pointing out stupid, self-centered decisions is not "woman hating" but calling it that is a favorite tactic of those who can't otherwise defend their previously mentioned decisions.

                  And in case it hasn't dawned on you yet, the "abyss" has been created by people throwing away the "family" in favor of having a pointless career, materialism and the all important, it's all about me attitude of the modern American female.

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.3 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:13 AM EST
                  Wanda-358181

                  You can thank John F. Kennedy for the changes that sent women into the work arena.  His idea to put a man on the moon meant that all Americans, including women, had to work.  Coupled with the National Organization of Women they made women who stayed at home feel like pariahs, so under pressure they went to work.  I think NOW has done a great disservice to women, children and families in the USA.  Where is NOW in helping women with services they need?  No where to be seen.

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.4 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:19 AM EST
                  BelleforObama

                  Pointing out stupid, self-centered decisions is not "woman hating" but calling it that is a favorite tactic of those who can't otherwise defend their previously mentioned decisions.

                  You must be the type of person who blames the woman when the marriage fails. How is taking care of and providing for your family a "self-centered decision"? For many it isn't a choice! I don't have a choice. Either you work or your family fails. Many can't afford only one income, it won't pay the rent. I'm going to school full time, and now have to look for at least a part-time job because one income just won't cut it. And since people are getting laid off up here that might be a problem.

                  It's people who make ignorant comments who are self-centered. Maybe you should stop blaming people who work their butts off and do something productive with your time, like helping. Life isn't perfect.

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.5 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:45 AM EST
                  HJWhite

                  Johncarter:  What a close minded view point on things.  Not all women stayed home in prior generations.  My grandmother worked as a nurse and still raised 4 well respected, educated and successful daughters who all worked along with their husbands.  I was in child care from teh age of 2 months and turned out just fine, if not better than kids who are home all the time.  In fact studies have proven that kids in childcare are much more prepared for Kindergarten both socially and educationally.  I am so furious with this neanderthal attitude of people (men and women) who call women bad moms for choosing to work. My mom was the main bread earner in my family but we could've lived on my dad's pay.  My mom even tried to be a stay at home mom when I was in fourth grade and she realized she wanted to be a career women.  I didn't pay tens of thousands of dollars a year to be a cook and maid, so when I do get remarried and have more children I can almost guarantee you I will still have a career because I enjoy my work.  Please educate yourself on the pros and cons of families that work and put kids in daycare. 

                  • 2 votes
                  #9.6 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:06 AM EST
                  cathy-722685

                  I am a working mom and to all of you who see everything in black and white let me point out a few things.  I was blessed to be able to stay home with my daughter and they were some of the best moments of my life.  You may ask then why did you go back to work.  The reason was because my husband did not get a raise in his salary for three years.  Our income did not go up but everything else did.  Alot of people have also talked about the days when your family would help you.  I would love for my daughter to stay with my mother.  There is just one problem she is 72 and not able to take care of a almost 3 yr old.  Couple that with the fact that she lives 3 and a half hours away.  My husband's mother passes away 10 yrs ago and even if she was living she would be an hour and a half away.  WE HAVE NO FAMILY NEAR US TO HELP US. 

                  When we came to the point that we said I needed to go back to work I looked at a lot of daycares.  I visited them multiple times and when we made our choice we would make random visits to check on them.  The place where my daughter is enrolled is a loving neurturing place and we love everyone there.  I go during my lunch and read to her room.  When they have parties I take me lunch then and go help.  They are very big in having the parents involved in everything they do.

                  Let me make this clear to all of you who keep saying that we just wanted more crap.  Most of the toys my daughter has have been hand-me-downs from others.  There are no big name lables in my closet.  I have four pairs of shoes.  My car was brought used (my husband does have a nice car but he bought that before we got married)  And to let you know we have no credit card either.  If we did want something we saved for it! 

                  And when we get home the TV does not go on.  It is play time and reading time.  I know a lot of stay at home parents who use the TV as a babysitter.  How is that good for the child.  On the weekends it is art projects and going to the playground and spending time as a family.

                  For all of you who lead such a charmed life that everything to you is black and white I say lucky you.  The rest of us have to leave in the real world.

                  • 3 votes
                  #9.7 - Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:18 PM EST
                  Reply
                  sneilarreal

                  With some economist's calling for the 'possibility' of 9 to 10 % unemployment rates within a year...I can only imagine how bad this is all going to get.

                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#10 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 9:10 PM EST
                  lawyermom-655610

                  I see some very naive comments on this 'vine.  But for the grace of God go many of you.  I see many single moms who are not single by choice and don't struggle by choice.  The fathers of their children do not take responsibility as my father did, and perhaps your father did.  Sometime, bad times befall good people who have done everything "right."  Sure, there are those who have made their bed, but I still I can afford to be sympathetic toward their children.  Their innocent children deserve better than many of them are getting in these difficult economic times.  There is no harm, is there, in helping out by donating extra you may have?  I, for one, have paid child care bills for other families in our daycare that are behind and just need a little help to get back on their feet.  We rise or fall together -- you wouldn't begrudge a child in need would you?  Also, in many cultures, families do pitch in so that some do not become homeless.  Isn't that what love and family is all about?  Siemper Fi, yes, but love thy neighbor, too. 

                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#11 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 9:34 PM EST
                  Bluedonner

                  God bless you, Lawyermom, for your kindness towards others and for your compassion. In my opinion, and as you stated, there are a few posting here that need to remember "there but for the grace of God go I."

                  • 1 vote
                  #11.1 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 11:49 PM EST
                  dadwhodoes

                  im a divorced dad who splits the cost fo over $1100 dollars a month to send my 2 yr old son to day care...its an excellent place, and i cry thinking of having to yank him out...but single dads also do what they can...not all dont handle there responsiblities...some bust their humps 60,70, even more hours per week, to do what they have to do...smiling there butts off in front of there kids, but trembling inside everytime i have one of my Caterings gigs cancel or drastically scale back...think on that.

                  • 3 votes
                  #11.2 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:37 AM EST
                  Florida_kes

                  not all dont handle there responsiblities...some bust their humps 60,70, even more hours per week,

                  Actually, most do handle their responsibilities. But that point doesn't further the anti-family, man-hating agenda of the so-called feminist movement.

                    #11.3 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:18 AM EST
                    BelleforObama

                    It's nice to see some good people on this board, bless you.

                    • 1 vote
                    #11.4 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:46 AM EST
                    brittany-633223

                    Thank you lawyer mom.  I'm not a single mother by choice, but it is my situation and I must embrace it and make the best of it.  It's not my fault my daughter's father didn't want the responsibility of being a father.  And it is my fault for not pursuing child support, but i don't want his measly money, he is probably paying child support for his other kid anyway.  My thing is, I am trying to make the best out of a not-so-good situation, and I am trying to do right by my daughter.  And I am not going to be like some other women out there and think that I have land a man for fninacial security, but I am trying to do it for myself. 

                      #11.5 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:27 PM EST
                      lawyermom-655610

                      Brittany - It sounds like you are a very strong, determined individual.  Of course, I do not know your particular situation, but please reconsider the child support issue.  After all, it is your daughter's right to be supported that you are giving up, not your own.  Perhaps there is a legal aid society (if you live near a law school, many of them help persons such as you).  If, however, you would be putting yourself or your child at risk by attempting this, you should also take that into consideration.  Good luck to you and your daughter.  My thoughts and prayers are with you.  Stay strong.

                        #11.6 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:16 PM EST
                        brittany-633223

                        I totally understand where you are coming from, and i have wrestled with this decision many times (especially when it is hard to pay those bills) but he doesn't WANT to be a father, I'm not going to make him.  I don't want her to be an obligation.  She deserves much more than that.

                        Plus, long story short, his stepfather has been accused of sexually abusing his sister, and i don't want to take any chances on my child being anywhere near this man. 

                        I have prayed about my situation, and I know God has a plan for me.  Not sure what it is, and i question it a lot of the time, but I know I am doing the right thing and on the right path.

                          #11.7 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:50 PM EST
                          Reply
                          dadwhodoes

                          $1100...with 2 zeros

                            Reply#12 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:38 AM EST
                            LAFN@U_DUmEEs

                            Have you geniuses not seen the YouTube videos of the Congressional Black Caucus, Barney Frank et al insisting that Fannie and Freddie were stable and safe?  President Bush and John McCain called for reform of these institutions, but the Democrats in Congress blocked a vote on it.  What do you think caused the economic collapse?  What policies of the Republicans caused this collapse?  Nancy Pelosi is a lying sack of entrails, and knows that you know NOTHING about economics, and are too busy watching American Idol to read a book.  A wise man said, "Ignorance is America's most expensive commodity."  NO KIDDING!

                              Reply#13 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:42 AM EST
                              LAFN@U_DUmEEs

                              Good for you, lawyermom! My family gives to charitable causes on a regular basis.  We do NOT believe that the government is entitled to any more of our income.  How arrogant for Obama, a man who is much wealthier than our family and gives NO money to charity, to tell people like us that we are selfish! He is simply A-R-R-O-G-A-N-T and a socialist.  If you want to live in a socialist country, move to Europe, where they have perfected redistribution of income to an art form.  Better yet, Canada is closer.  I wonder why over 10,000 people yearly come to the US for healthcare from a country with a universal system?  Hmmm.....

                                Reply#14 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:59 AM EST
                                Dana-287682

                                If you can't afford kids, don't have them.    There are no guarantees that daddy will always be around to provide a second income.  It's a shame that the dumbest women statistically have more kids - future low wage earners.  This cycle will never be broken.

                                Anyone stupid enough to work for an automaker since 1990 should realize that it's a decling industry.  Just because you have a job doesn't mean that you are entitled to permanent employment, huge wages or a free pass for poor performance.

                                If your income is so shaky that you need two people working 70+ hour weeks to pay the bills then you can a) not have kids or have less kids b) reduce your expenses and/or c) have whatever you want or think you need but quit whining.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#15 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:41 AM EST
                                luvenia48

                                People like you do not deserve children. What is something happens that you can not afford to supply them with their basic needs, what then? Will you just give them away? These children we are talking about are already here and they need help now. Don't want to help, then don't. You live in a box and the real world is hiden from you. I am ashamed for you because I don't believe you have a heart so you can be ashamed for yourself. Don't forget you and your kind can lose everything the way so many others have done so far.

                                  #15.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:40 PM EST
                                  Reply
                                  Dana-287682

                                  If you can't afford kids, don't have them.    There are no guarantees that daddy will always be around to provide a second income.  It's a shame that the dumbest women statistically have more kids - future low wage earners.  This cycle will never be broken.

                                  Anyone stupid enough to work for an automaker since 1990 should realize that it's a decling industry.  Just because you have a job doesn't mean that you are entitled to permanent employment, huge wages or a free pass for poor performance.

                                  If you don't want to pay child support, don't have kids. 

                                  If your income is so shaky that you need two people working 70+ hour weeks to pay the bills then you can a) not have kids or have less kids b) reduce your expenses and/or c) have whatever you want or think you need but quit whining.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#16 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:42 AM EST
                                  nadasheep

                                  I just love these compassionate posts.

                                  So what, sterilize people who do not have high IQ's or college degrees? The Nazi's did that with people who didn't measure up to their standards either. And sorry to tell you, but many of those women who are in low paying jobs do jobs that keep this country going. Or would you like to see all service industry jobs gone too? You certainly won't get the companies to pay higher. And not all people can afford or are able to go to college. Not all people are cut out for it. But then we fall back to the IQ test, right?

                                  Sorry to tell you that even a college degree will not guarantee you a job at all, let alone a higher paying one.

                                  I have a college degree. I'm sure my IQ is at least as high ( and quite possibly higher, unless you are in the MENSA level IQ range) than yours. When I married I gave up my career to stay home once we started having children. We lived very modestly, though he had a good income and stable job. Small, inexpensive house, used cars, second -hand clothes. All of that so we could make sure we were still saving as well. (We saved almost as much as we spent for our kids' future education and retirement) We didn't need the big stuff. In '99 I became disabled with a chronic illness I will have for the rest of my life. He left because of it (spent a lot of savings on medical bills) for another woman, moved in with her, divorced me, and married her two weeks after we divorced. I did not want the divorce. He pays child support. I went back to college because  I could not take a job that I had gone to school for. I physically could not do the job. Due to downsizing and outsourcing many of those jobs now required extra hours to make up for the lost ones ( mandatory overtime, or there's the door. Plenty of people waiting to come in, thank you), or you were needing to do 2 and 3 jobs that had been covered by 2 or 3 other people who now were gone.

                                  When I went back to school, childcare had gone through the roof because it was now being taxed. People who used to charge one or two dollars an hour had to charge more to help cover the loss because of the taxes. Modest people who did babysitting in their homes so they could stay home with their own children.

                                  I did live in a very inexpensive duplex. As priced have gone up and up, the rent kept getting raised, utilities and groceries and the price of gas going up and up ( until very recently, and I think it will go *back* up), I had to move into a one bedroom apartment with my kids because that was what I could afford. I sleep on the couch. I shop for the cheapest food I can. We do not go out, my kids do not participate in anything at school that costs money. But that's ok. We have a roof over our heads.

                                  I know many women who stayed home to raise their families, only to have their spouses leave for greener grass. Or men whose wives left and they need daycare so they can work. My ex spent a year selling and moving things into her accounts, very, very slowly so that by the time we divorced there was nothing. He had quit making the house payment and put that money into her account so that he filed bankruptcy and gave up the house when he left. During that time, when he was socking the money away in her bank account, his behavior towards me did not change. Not until the one day he said "I'm leaving." I myself could not afford an attorney. He had one of the best and told me I was lucky to keep the kids.

                                  I know many people who have lost their very good, seemingly stable marriages or jobs. People who had children and then lost their jobs so that both parents then had to work.

                                  In the last 6 months or so tens of thousands ( around 200,000 I believe I read) of people have lost their jobs because of the economy, not because they did something wrong. People who had very good paying jobs for many, many years and then could not find jobs and took much lower paying jobs, or multiple part time jobs, just to have something coming in. Jobs where they could not pick and choose their hours and daycare became necessary.  I receive SSDI. ( Which trust me, they don't hand out unless you *are* disabled. It's not welfare.) Until I graduate and get a job I live on SSDI and child support. I don't get welfare or food stamps. My medications and doctors are covered by Medicare which I pay for. I am going into a health care field that will allow me to work even with my disability. I chose it because there are jobs ( at least for now) and they pay decent ( and can't be moved or shipped elsewhere).

                                  I take classes when my kids are in school, but holidays or snow days I have had to stay home because I could not afford day care.

                                  So for those people who keep saying "if you can't afford kids don't have them"  my family was very secure financially and my ex remains so.  There are many, many families who had very good, decent jobs that have been lost. There are mothers who stayed home to raise their children ( and were criticized for not working). There were women who had been married who found themselves single with no choice but to work ( you know, the people you don't want on welfare). And while I am lucky that my ex pays child support, there are many men ( and women) who don't, who sneak around the system.  

                                  As one other poster said, each situation is different and you cannot judge other people in a one-size-fits-all box. As jobs have been lost, many families have been forced to have both parents working. They have sold their houses to move into smaller ones. They *have* done everything to cope and carry on.

                                  These people HAD good jobs with stable companies, many of which are still around. The jobs just went to Mexico or Asia. Spouses who had children and were divorced. People who have had to go from full time to multiple part time jobs. Prices of even the basics have gone up and up. Bread here was about 80 cents just two years ago and is now $1.50 for example. Milk is around $5.00 a gallon in some places.

                                  So as you sit, all cozy in your judgements, there are families who did do everything "right" according to you, (living within their means or below it) , mothers and fathers who did do everything "right" and could very well afford to have those children. It's the economy and jobs. Quit blaming the people. Or should they just send their children to orphanages because they can't afford to live without 2 incomes, or find themselves single after many years of marriage? People who had jobs that have disappeared as companies have gone under or "restructured" through downsizing and mergers, or jobs have left the country. Sure that would be great for the kids. "Sorry honey, can't afford you anymore. Now run along into that nice building where you will be warehoused". How would those children be supported? You would be supporting them. What exactly do you suggest for those children whose parents could afford them when they were born, and now are struggling to keep food on the table?  People how have reduced and reduced and reduced their spending, who were not out overspending to begin with?

                                  I don't whine about what I don't have or what my children don't have. I readjust again and again and do my very best. Just as the vast majority of parents, single or married, have been trying to do.

                                  You also said "have less kids". Sorry, but even in marriages there are unplanned pregnancies. So what, go abort that child because it wasn't in the budget this year? Do we pass laws so that only those with a certain level of IQ, education and income have children? Send them away with the job? Have the government limit the number of children a couple can have? Hmm, seems to me they do that certain parts of the world. Wonderful countries. What would you be legislated to not have?

                                  Yeah, you're a very *smart* person. Your compassion is also overwhelming.

                                  • 4 votes
                                  #16.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:05 AM EST
                                  TSteel

                                  Just in case you failed to realize this, many pregnancies are unplanned and not all forms of birth control are fool proof. So does that mean married couples should not have sex because of the small chance they may have a child they can't afford? All your high horse preaching doesn't change the fact that 18% of children in the US live in poverty. Hopefully you sterilized yourself so you don't have to worry about bringing a child into this world so you can adopt one of the unwanted ones.

                                    #16.2 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:07 PM EST
                                    Jeff-397806

                                    Nadasheep... Good Post.  It's amazing all of the people posting here that have no compassion and no clue as to what is really happening in America.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #16.3 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:36 PM EST
                                    Reply
                                    dsaidit

                                     If you do not have a job, you should not send your kids to day care.   The situation we are in are because of the last two years of a democratic controlled congress.   We are enjoying lower gas prices today because Bush said we would consider drilling our own oil again.   The gas prices dropped immediately.   Now, Obama is going to write an executive order that we cannot drill for our own independent oil.  The gas prices will shoot through the roof very soon.  The places that we would drill WILL NOT DISTURB anything.   Do your own research and stop being a puppet for the liberal news media who have brainwashed you.

                                      Reply#17 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:37 AM EST
                                      Florida_kes

                                      Unlike being a Limbaugh lemming such as yourself?

                                      Unbelievable!

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #17.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:20 AM EST
                                      KRob in KC

                                      We're currently enjoying lower gas prices because of the belief that we as Americans will spend the money we save on gas on material things that will in turn boost the economy. It's a gimmick once again by a government trying to cement a failed presidency. And by the way, two things. Drilling will not begin immediately. It takes years of preparation for equipment, employees, and to make sure all enviromental precautions are done within regulations. Second, where is there a single place in our country that if you drill it will not disturb anything? In the Gulf, where there is marine life and beautiful shores? Yes nothing like black gold spewing out as far as the eye can see. How about Alaska? Let's give the citizens of Alaska bigger paychecks from oil revenues every year while forest and wildlife disappear. Yet Congress is the problem and Obama is a socialist. Isn't redistribution of revenue to private citizens by the federal government considered socialist? What about the Earned Income Tax Credit? Wasn't it a Republican President in finally put that into play in the early 80's? You talk of the liberal media brainwashing people yet you mention Bush made gas prices go down just because we're going to start drilling again. And who's brainwashed?

                                        #17.2 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:54 AM EST
                                        Jeff-397806

                                        Gas prices are down because the price of a barrel of oil has come down.  All the drilling we could ever do will not effect the price of a gallon of gas that much.  Has anyone noticed that the profit margins involved with oil have gone up?  What really happened at the secret energy meeting that Bush had?  Hmmmm .. Of course this is not the topic of child day care.  If there are two parents in a family and one is not working than there is the daycare.  Grandparents, relatives, friends, they can help with daycare.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #17.3 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:43 PM EST
                                        Patricia Navadomskis

                                        I agree if you are not working the kid belongs at home .Maybe you would enjoy this.

                                        If you are in the low earning range---staying home,cooking real food from a Grocery store---clipping coupons     Do Day care yourselve   How about this  Cloth Diapers

                                        and the second hand store are no embarrassment these days. Great finds.

                                        That is how people used to start out  slowly   used furniture stay home with the kids for awhile or work differant shifts   this is nothing new. And Bush is not to blame

                                        you should plan for a little trouble to come your way.

                                        Make the most of your time together .

                                        Do you know you can make your own playdoh   read book sing songs

                                        go to the library for free     you can cut back    do with out   you can manage

                                        Plenty of people have   sick dead deserting  husbands  and wifes

                                        you should never count on two paychecks

                                          #17.4 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:54 PM EST
                                          Reply
                                          Grannybear

                                          There are retired folks who either don't have any kids (so, no grandkids) or whose grown children are doing OK financially and can take care of their children without help from Mom and Dad.  Those retired folks can be accessed through Senior Centers, and perhaps a program could be set up whereby retirees could be paired with families whose day care situation is a mess.  This would be a role-reversal of the "Adopt-A-Grandparent" program.

                                          God bless, and let's help each other--without condemning, please; life is tough enough!

                                          • 1 vote
                                          Reply#18 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:37 AM EST
                                          Wanda-358181

                                          Having seniors take care of children seems like a simple solution.  However, what you may not recognize is that a lot of seniors can't tolerate the noise and rambunctious activity of young children being around.  I am a 60 year old grandmother and although I love my grandchildren, I'd find it less stressful to go dig ditches somewhere than babysit for 8-10 hours a day while my children work.  My nerves couldn't handle the noise level.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #18.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:28 AM EST
                                          Reply
                                          poorfolk

                                          when min. wage went up recently by a quarter, local childcare centers raised the weekly care of a child 20.00. Sounds to me they bit themself in the A$$ and now have no children to watch.

                                          Maybe some of these people can co-op the babysitting as some used to do in the past?? Luckily I have grown children and no longer have that struggle.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          Reply#19 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:50 AM EST
                                          poorfolk

                                          grannybear has a great idea! There may be other ideas out there also.

                                          If more people would spend less time complaining and looking for solutions......

                                          • 1 vote
                                          Reply#20 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:55 AM EST
                                          Kidtamer

                                          I have a small daycare in my home. I am not licensed per se but I am certified by the federal nutrition program. Not all unlicensed homes, daycare providers, are "dangerous." I feel that I provide a loving, home-like environment for my kids and hope that my parents feel the same way. They must, they keep bringing their kids to me. I have had the same three families in care for several years now. The only other reason that they continue to bring their children is that I have made the decision not to raise my rates to accommodate the higher cost of living. I am taking a loss but I don't mind so much if I can continue to provide a healthy, happy environment and feed them nutritious foods. The grocery bills are literally higher every single week. Every time I go to the store I pay more for the same goods. To offset some of this, my parents have started "donating" milk, meat, fresh fruits and vegetables, etc. It isn't a hardship for each family to bring a food item or two a week and it helps me greatly.

                                          We also often trade for services. One of my dads is a painter. I needed my fence painted, he needed daycare...a deal was made. We barter and trade all the time. (good economics in any situation, I think) There are advantages to using a private home daycare provider. Being able to barter is one of them. So long as the provider is certified in first aid and CPR, is on the nutrition program and is experienced, I think that they are just as good as any center. In some respects they are better. I spend much more one-to-one time with my kids than a center is able to do. I also feel that my kids get more "love" than a center would give. This is important. Yes, they need to learn, to be socialized...but they also need love and attention. I think that home-based daycare is a wonderful alternative to center care. I wish that news articles wouldn't concentrate so much on the few bad providers and realize that my kind of daycare is a real alternative to center-based care. It is cheaper, more personalized and in many cases, closer to home or work.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          Reply#21 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:12 AM EST
                                          RNgirl1976

                                          I can totally understand about having to pull your child from a daycare center because of economic hardships. But what I don't understand, is how the state can say you don't qualify for any child care assistance for whatever reason. We have three children in our home, ages 12, 8, and 4. Thankfully our youngest is the only one who requires any childcare because of our schedules.

                                          My husband recently lost his job and has taken a job over 60 miles away from our home and commutes back and forth every day. I am a full time nursing student with a year left until I graduate. Because of our financial strain, we applied for food stamps and child care assistance. It took a lot of humbling to go somewhere and ask for help. Can you guess what the response was? You got it....a big fat no for either assistance. And the reason? Because of my husbands past month income and what he was going to be making, we made $900 a month too much for food stamps and I only went to school 18 hours a week and not the minimum of 25 to qualify for child care assistance. Okay, so I can handle being denied assistance with food, no big deal. But as far as school....do these idiots not realize I am a NURSING student?  I put way more than 25 hours of my own time into the program on TOP of what I do at school on a weekly basis. Give us a freaking break for once!

                                          I guess that's what you get for being an HONEST, hardworking American citizen.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          Reply#22 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:15 AM EST
                                          Enma3

                                          You make $900 a month too much and you are complaining?  I'm aware of how the system works--so at $900 over the income level, if you can not find the money for groceries out of that $900 you are spending your money on frivilous items.  Eligibility for food stamps takes into account your income, less the NECESSITIES of living--- less school tuition, less rent and/or mortgages, less medical bills, less utilities, less health and home insurance--so with $900 a month left after these expenses-You have enough money for groceries. 

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #22.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:41 AM EST
                                          Reply
                                          Grannybear

                                          Kudos to Kidtamer and others who provide home-daycare.  I did after-school care in the '70s so I could stay at home with my own kids.  There are home-daycare associations that offer support and a forum for ideas-that-work for providers.  To those who are unhappy with the outcome of the recent elections, I suggest that we need to be looking at how the candidates are chosen--and at who does the choosing!  The process of choosing candidates actually begins at the local level--at PTA, school board, and city council level.  It is the people who begin serving their communities at the local level, who really have the understanding necessary to help meet the needs of "We, the People."  There are 24 hours in every day, and PTA, school board, and city council meetings are once a month.  For those who decry 'socialism,' the word has been totally misused.  It's supposed to mean, "From each, according to ability--to each, according to need."  Also, the exercise of a "right," implies the willingness to accept the "responsibility" that guarantees the proper use of the "right."  End of sermon :)

                                            Reply#23 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:33 AM EST
                                            LTG123

                                            Maybe B. Hussen N-Obama can raise your taxes and put more daycare centers out of business, because that's what his "CHANGE" program is all about! Get ready America, you voted a LOSER and now you will suffer the consequences. Lower taxes and small business grants and loans are the answer, NOT taxpayer funding of Financial industry bailout! Woe to us who will pay and pay and get zilch in return. The Dems only want to raise spending without revealing the true costs of their upcoming programs. WAKE UP AMERICA it's going to be a hell of a ride!

                                              Reply#24 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:03 AM EST
                                              Sarah01

                                              I am a single mother struggling to balance work and home life with my 4 moth old child.  I have to work to support us.  I resent having to do this and pay taxes so that other woman can stay home with their kids, get free health care, free formula and free everything else, whilst women like me have to work to pay for it!!!  Often these women do not even speak English!!!!  I propose day care centers be opened, staffed by these women who can work, choose not to and are supported by hard working folks, to enable women like me to have access to cheap day care.  It's time to give back to the community, especially in hard times like now.  If these women do not want to work, then cut off their benefits.  Then they will be forced to work. 

                                              • 1 vote
                                              Reply#25 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:50 AM EST
                                              SonOfLliberty2008

                                              I am a single mother

                                              Why?

                                                #25.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:23 PM EST
                                                Kibbitzer

                                                I am a single mother

                                                Why?

                                                Why does it matter why?  Woman become single mothers for plenty of different reasons.  Some good, some not so good.  Either way however, it's none of your business.

                                                Sarah, I agree with your post.  However, I'm not sure if I want my daughter being taken care of by the lazy people who the system.

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #25.2 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:43 PM EST
                                                SonOfLliberty2008

                                                it's none of your business

                                                Maybe it shouldn't be posted to a public forum then.

                                                And yes I think why matters a lot, or I wouldn't have asked the question.

                                                I can't imagine any good reason to be a single mother.

                                                  #25.3 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:09 PM EST
                                                  Kibbitzer

                                                  Maybe good reason was the wrong way to put it.  Howver, there are situations where it is much better of for the child/children that parents stay single.  Maybe the father was abusive, and it only was discovered once the child was born.  Would you have the mother stay with the father?

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #25.4 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:30 PM EST
                                                  SonOfLliberty2008

                                                  I suppose that's true, but realistically, it's hard to imagine a guy only getting abusive after the kids are born. 

                                                    #25.5 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:03 PM EST
                                                    Reply
                                                    Another Mom

                                                    I'm not sure what prior generation you are referring to where the mothers alll stayed home, etc.  My mother worked afternoon or night shifts as a nurse.  She did this not to buy another tv or a second car, but to pay for a new heating system.  My father, no slacker either, was going to take on another job and work seven days a week, but my mother saw this as a better way.  There is no shame in working to take care of your family and the truth of the matter is that most people are in the work force first and foremost because they need to be. 

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    Reply#26 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:01 AM EST
                                                    RNgirl1976

                                                    I couldn't agree with you more. What makes things really difficult is when you pay into a system that won't help you because you aren't "poor enough".

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #26.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:07 AM EST
                                                    TSteel

                                                    It is sad how assistance wont help so you can avoid reaching the level of poverty that is so hard to climb out of. 

                                                      #26.2 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:19 PM EST
                                                      Reply
                                                      girl77

                                                      I am pulling my child out of daycare. I am one of the lucky ones i guess. I only pay $70.00 a week for care. And the care is one of the best! I am just lucky i live in a very small town and the cost of living here is very low. Heck, my house cost only 30,000 and its a 3 bedroom and NO i dont live in the ghetto.  But the reason i am pulling my kid out of daycare is that I am changing jobs.  I wont be able to afford daycare any longer. I am going to part time work (two days a week) by choice. Without the cost of daycare, i will bring home the same amount of money as if i worked full time! i will be short about 50 dollars a week, but that will be made up in the difference of eating out everyday (i am on the road a lot with my current state job). I understand why a lot of parents pull there kids out. My brother lives in the 'city' and they pay about 1500 a month in child care! you work just to pay your daycare provider.

                                                        Reply#27 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:25 AM EST
                                                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                                        Leave a Comment:
                                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                        Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                        FUN STUFF:
                                                        • Leaderboard |
                                                        • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                        • Top of the Vine |
                                                        • Newsvine Live |
                                                        • Newsvine Archives |
                                                        • The Greenhouse |
                                                        COMPANY STUFF:
                                                        • Code of Honor |
                                                        • Company Info |
                                                        • Contact Us |
                                                        • Jobs |
                                                        • User Agreement |
                                                        • Privacy Policy |
                                                        • About our ads
                                                        LEGAL STUFF:
                                                        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com